Privacy v. Public Safety: New IT Rules

Lately, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has exhorted Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, in February this year.  These new standards widely deal with the rule of online media and over-the-top (OTT) arranges and modernized news along with to stick to a boundlessly tighter arrangement of rules inside a quarter of a year, which finished on May 25.

These norms hope to give consistency of law and a protest redressal instrument for customers of electronic media stages, educating applications, ongoing highlights as furthermore progressed news distributors. And

(1) Extending the obligation of the online media stages, (for instance, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc.) to hinder their maltreatment and abuse by following extra due ingenuity, which also includes appointment of chief compliance officer, nodal contact person and resident grievance officer.[1]

(2) Connecting with the customers of electronic media by setting up a three-level redressal part for useful grievance objectives. The Intermediary Guidelines have been illustrated in exercise of powers under section 87(2) of the IT Act and supersede the previous Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines) Rules, 2011.

As the wipe out time of May 26 for the execution of these norms came closer, online media has been turned with posts contemplating whether opposition of these principles would prompt Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp getting restricted in India. Further we shall be discussing why it’s needed? Its salient features, important definitions, recent controversy regarding IT rules, critical analysis: Privacy v. need for govt. control, further observations done by courts and to how much extent it’s good for public safety.[2]


India is declared to be the world’s “most prominent open Web society” and draws in different online media relationships to collaborate in India. Notwithstanding, there are a making number of occasions where electronic media is being utilized as a gadget for dismissing the regard of ladies, scare, undermine; affronting strict convictions or slants by communicating harmful, slanderous comments to spread viciousness, affecting hazardous to public ‘bogus news’, cash related cheats and selection of youth by dread-based oppressor affiliations. It was in this way considered to get under way a system for shopper grievances and redressal powers as Mediator Rules.

So basically, the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order dated December 11, 2018 observed and directed the government of India in SUO MOTO writ petition that it must to outline essential rules to end child pornography, assault and gang rape symbolisms, recordings and destinations in content facilitating stages and different applications. the Hon’ble High Court request dated September 24, 2019 sorting everything out the Assistance of  the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology  to incite the course disturbing events in regard about finishing the way toward telling the new norms, finally, the report of the Extraordinarily allotted driving party of the Rajya Sabha dated February 3, 2020 identifying with the disturbing issue of erotic entertainment through online media and its impact on kids and society with everything considered.[3]


  •  The Guidelines embrace due energy that ought to be followed by go-betweens, investigating for the web media focus people. Obstacle thereto has a cut-off conceded aftereffect of getting liberated from impediment permitted to go-betweens under area 79 of the IT Act.
  • The principles try to engage the clients by ordering the mediators, including web-based media middle people, to build up a complaint redressal instrument for accepting settling grumblings from the clients or casualties.
  • Delegates will designate a Complaint Official to manage such grievances and offer the name and contact subtleties of such official.
  • Complaint Official will recognize the protest inside 24 hours and resolve it inside fifteen days from its receipt.[4]
  • It Guarantees Online Security and Respect of Clients, Particularly Ladies Clients by eliminating and debilitating the entrance of mediators inside 24 hours of getting of grievances of substance that uncovered the private spaces of people, show such people in full or fractional nakedness or in the sexual demonstration or is in the idea of pantomime including transformed pictures, and so on Such a grievance can be recorded either by the individual or by some other individual on his/her benefit.
  • There are numerous laws to battle unlawful substances that are as of now set up. The new guidelines conceive bringing their uniform application.
  • A distributor and automatic body are additionally needed to make valid and complete honesty of all complaints received by it, the way wherein complaints are discarded, the activity taken on the complaint, answer shipped off the complainant.
  • In case of non-recognition of the principles of Mediator Rules by a middle person, the arrangements of sub-area (1) of segment 79 of the IT Act won’t be material to such delegate and the go-between will be at risk for discipline under any law for the time being in power remembering for agreement with the arrangements of the IT Act and the Indian Corrective Code.[5]


Intermediary concerning particular electronic records infers any person who in light of a legitimate concern for another person gets stores or imparts that record or offers any help in regards to that record as per portion 2(w) of the IT Act. An agent moreover consolidates destinations, applications and passages of electronic media networks, media sharing locales, destinations, online discussion social affairs and other such for all intents and purposes near middle people as per the ‘Code’.

Electronic Media Centre individual suggests a representative which fundamentally or solely enables online participation between at any rate two customers and licenses them to make, move, share, disperse, change or access information using its organizations.

Immense Online Media Negotiator (hereinafter ‘SSMI’) infers an electronic media centre individual having different enlisted customers in India better than the limit as exhorted by the Central Government as indicated by control 2(y) of the ‘Code’.[6]


The standards come when the nation is continually endeavoring to guarantee the wellbeing and power of the internet and of individual information. Web-based media is progressively turning into a significant piece of a person’s life. WhatsApp presently has a client base of 340 million in the nation, representing the biggest number of supporters in the world.2 Facebook has 290 million, Twitter 17 million, YouTube 265 million and Instagram, 120 million client base.

With a particularly gigantic populace reliant upon web-based media stages, the tech-goliaths can’t decide to overlook the new and arising difficulties like steady spread of phony news, widespread maltreatment of the stages to share transformed pictures of ladies, profound fakes and different substance that compromise the pride of ladies and represent a danger to security.

Occurrences of utilization of oppressive language, abusive substance and disdain discourse in these stages have gotten normal. The calculations utilized by these stages to improve perspectives and notices regularly neglect to recognize important or valuable substance and harmful substance and phony news, in this way intensifying them in next to no or no time.

Taking into account such arising difficulties, the Supreme Court in 2018, in the Tehseen S. Poona Walla v/s Union of India case, guided the public authority to control and stop scattering of touchy messages and recordings on different web-based media stages which tend to induce crowd viciousness and lynching of any kind.3 The Court in 2017 saw that the public authority may outline fundamental rules to take out kid erotic entertainment, assault and assault symbolisms, recordings and destinations in content facilitating stages and other applications.

The new standards are subsequently as per the past Supreme Court perceptions. According to the guidelines, go-betweens are commanded to eliminate or incapacitate substances that are against the wellbeing and respect of people inside 24 hours of accepting objections. Such objections can be recorded either by the individual or an individual on his/her benefit. As indicated by the public authority, knowing the “principal originator of data” (otherwise called “recognizability”) of messages that cause brutality, riots, psychological oppression, assault or danger to public safety fall under sensible exemptions for Right to Privacy – which again isn’t outright according to the Constitution.[7]


These principles return on the of numerous discussions including these stages and expanding worries about their unregulated status.

•There has been analysis about acquiring a plenty of new principles that should be regularly set off just through administrative activity.

1. WhatsApp has indicted the Government of India, saying that India’s new IT rules disregard the privilege to security of Indian clients and required the web-based media delegate rules to be proclaimed illegal.

It encroaches upon the central right to protection without fulfilling the three-section test set out by the Supreme Court of legitimateness, need and proportionality.

WhatsApp needs the court to guarantee the provision doesn’t come into power, and forestall criminal obligation to its workers for resistance.

It abuses the principal right to the right to speak freely of discourse and articulation.

The prerequisite to empower distinguishing proof of the primary originator of the data is ultra vires its parent legal arrangement, Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

This denies the delegate of a reasonable plan of action if it can’t help contradicting the Government’s organization because of an exacting course of events.

Till now online media stages have the invulnerability that clients got from start to finish encryption was that middle people didn’t approach the substance of their messages. Forcing this obligatory necessity of recognizability will break this resistance; accordingly debilitating the security of the protection of these discussions. The danger here isn’t just one of security however to the degree of attack and hardship from a place of refuge. [8]

2 Twitter is occupied with a significant fight with the focal government over ‘controlled media’ labels on certain posts by individuals from the decision party Bharatiya Janata Party. While the public authority has advised Twitter to erase the labels, Twitter has not followed up on the mandate. Therefore, individuals from the Delhi Police’s uncommon cell apparently struck two of Twitter’s workplaces in India. [9]

3 Modi govt’s new IT rules don’t engage customers, yet extend State control over online substance – the Narendra Modi government’s new column with Twitter over the evacuation of political substance that the public authority thought about provocative and enemies of India. In any case, Twitter contended that nothing in these tweets abused laws on free discourse. While the public authority ultimately won and Twitter brought down a lion’s share of the substance it was coordinated to, this happened solely after combative trades between the two gatherings. Media reports hypothesized that Twitter chiefs could confront genuine legitimate repercussions for not agreeing with the public authority’s orders.[10]


The standards additionally don’t have shields to guarantee that clients of web-based media stages are made mindful that their own information will be put away and dissected by the tech goliaths. Experts dread the new guidelines may prompt broad get-together of individual data by web-based media stages without an online protection law. What’s more, we need to fundamentally examine how our security is getting influenced and the need for government control.

This standard unmistakably will have a significant danger to the security of the clients. The issue of discernibility of originators of data on informing stages is additionally the subject of suit.

The authoritative history of Section 79 [of the Information Technology Act] clarifies that the public authority comes up short on the ability to force preconditions on web delegates hoping to appreciate the vulnerabilities offered by Section 79.

With not a single protection law to be seen and the new government decides to sabotage that essential right, residents should be worried about the manner in which the state is noticing all online action.

Need for government control

The public authority is proceeding to get new guidelines in regards to the computerized space without yet having passed a protection lawThe new Rules award an expansive scope of government specialists the capacity to give requests to confine content or be given admittance to client information. These arrangements are especially upsetting given the absence of related oversight and responsibility arrangements, expansive authorization powers, and critical expected punishments.

Rule 3(1)(d) approves the “fitting government or its organization” to arrange go-betweens to eliminate content disallowed by laws identified with the expected sensible limitations on articulation set out in Article 19(2) of the constitution, while rules 15 and 16, which are appropriate to the two mediators and distributors, likewise award the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting position to give evacuation orders, including crisis orders requiring prompt reaction – another force that isn’t justified or reasonable under the parent act. Rule 3(1)(J), covering orders for go-betweens to “give data under its influence or ownership” is additionally excessively expensive, expressing that help should be allowed to “any administration organization which is legally approved for insightful or defensive or network protection exercises,” if there is a composed request unmistakably expressing the reason. mirrors its administration needs.

a significant possible effect on protection specifically through the prerequisites for web stages to follow the ‘originator’ of data, basically prohibiting the utilization of start to finish encryption by administrations like WhatsApp. The public authority has attempted to direct the long forthcoming issues of online media, yet there are sure things that will just advance with time. The government has attempted to manage the long forthcoming issues of web-based media, however there are sure things that will just develop with time.

Given the new difficulties in advanced substance, some severe arrangement measures are required. In any case, the middle choice to include in the complaint redressal measure as a zenith body can’t take care of these issues.

Additionally, over-guideline will demonstrate counterproductive in a country where the residents actually don’t have an information security law.

Along these lines, what is required is the uniform use of laws to battle unlawful substances that is as of now set up.[11]


2018: The Supreme Court (SC) had seen that the Government of India may diagram significant guidelines to murder kid sexual amusement, attack and gangrape imageries, chronicles and areas in content working with stages and various applications.

2020: An Ad-hoc gathering of the Rajya Sabha laid its report in the wake of considering the upsetting issue of sexual amusement by means of electronic media and its effect on young people and society all things considered and recommended for engaging unmistakable verification of the essential originator of such substance.

The government brought video electronic over-the-top (OTT) stages under the ambit of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.[12]


The new web-based media rules give methods for addressing complaints of substance that can be unsafe to the country’s security just as the humility or wellbeing of an individual.

Ensuring Compliance to Domestic Laws: Major mechanized media stages working in India are of new start.

The rules highlight the necessity for these electronic media delegates and online substance providers, whether or not for redirection or instructive purposes, to rigidly agree to the Constitution and local laws of India.

Bringing Uniformity: There are various laws to fight unlawful substances that are as of now set up. The new standards envision bringing their uniform application.

Social Imperative: It lays an outstanding emphasis on the security of women against the development of sexual offenses through electronic media. It furthermore imagines checking the development of fake news and scorn talk.[13]


The right to speak freely of discourse and articulation is the fundamental principle of any popular government. Notwithstanding, no opportunity is supreme or totally unlimited. The basis of finding some kind of harmony between principal rights and learning the sensibility of a limitation has been a steady exertion since the appropriation of the Constitution. The discussion has now arrived at the advanced world. The on-going tussle between private, tech monsters who own a significant measure of Big Data, governments envious of forcing sensible limitations and clients stressed over issues identifying with information protection and imperatives on the right to speak freely of discourse and articulation, is probably going to get more confounded before ideal arrangements can be shown up at. The IT Rules 2021 look to address worries of the residents without encroaching on their protection and individual freedoms, while keeping up advanced sway simultaneously.

[1] The Information Technology Rules 2021: An assault on Privacy as we know it, Available at:, (Last visited on 4 June, 2021).

[2] IT Rules 2021 and its impact on blanket privacy – iPleaders, Available at:, (Last visited on 4 June, 2021).

[3]  IT Rules 2021 and its impact on blanket privacy – iPleaders, Available at:, (Last visited on 4 June, 2021).

[4] India: Salient Features Of The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines And Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, Available at:, (Last visited on 5 June, 2021).

[5] New IT Rules 2021 – Drishti IAS, Available at:, (Last visited on 5 June ,2021).

[6]  IT Rules 2021 and its impact on blanket privacy – iPleaders, Available at:, (Last visited on 4 June, 2021).

[7] The Information Technology (IT) Rules, 2021, Available at:,(Last visited on 3 june, 2021).

[8] ETtech Explained: Government rules on WhatsApp & the controversy around it, Available at: , (last visited on 6 June, 2021).

[9] Twitter And WhatsApp Vs India’s New IT Rules, Available at:, (Last visited on 6 JunJune,21).

[10] Modi govt’s new IT rules don’t empower consumers, but expand State power over online content, Available at:, (Last visited on 6 June, 2021).

[11] Critical Analysis of New IT Rules 2021,Available at:, (Last visited on 6 June, 2021).

[12] New IT Rules 2021 – Drishti IAS,Available at:, (Last visited on 6 June , 2021).

[13] Overview of key regulations of IT Rules, 2021, Available at:, (Last visited on 6 June, 2021).

Author: Priya Patel from LPU, Jalandhar.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s