In an era marked by rapid digital transformation, the emergence of disputes is a natural consequence of progress particularly in evolving sectors such as e-commerce, financial technology, consumer protection, and international trade. While traditional litigation continues to uphold its vital role in the justice system, its formal structure often involving extended timelines, considerable costs, and procedural intricacies which presents hindrances to traditional litigation to provide timely and efficient dispute resolution.

As a response to these challenges, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) has emerged as a progressive and technology-driven alternative, enabling resolution of conflicts outside the conventional courtroom setting. ODR enhances established Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods including mediation, arbitration, and negotiation by integrating them into virtual platforms. This framework facilitates efficient, cost-effective, and accessible dispute resolution by leveraging advanced digital tools such as AI-enabled case management, secure video conferencing, and blockchain-based smart contracts.

UNDERSTANDING ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) represents a significant advancement in the field of dispute resolution, building upon the foundational principles of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods. Rather than simply digitizing traditional procedures, ODR redefines them by incorporating technological innovation to improve efficiency, accessibility, and procedural flexibility. It effectively removes geographical and logistical barriers, allowing parties to engage in dispute resolution without the constraints of physical presence or rigid scheduling. Through the integration of artificial intelligence, secure video conferencing, electronic document submission, and blockchain-enabled smart contracts, ODR offers a streamlined and cost-effective alternative to conventional mechanisms. Furthermore, it enables asynchronous participation, giving parties greater control over the timing and pace of their involvement. By preserving the collaborative and non-adversarial spirit of ADR while aligning it with the demands of a digital age, ODR stands out as a forward-looking, inclusive, and highly adaptive method of resolving modern legal disputes.

Role of ODR in Decentralizing Access to Justice

Removing the traditional, centralized gatekeepers of justice like physical courts and metro-city-based legal services and making justice more accessible, distributed, and closer to the people, especially those in remote areas.

ADVANTAGES

• Reduces reliance on physical courts -Speeds up resolution.

• Empowers citizens -They can initiate or resolve disputes online from anywhere.
• Bridges the urban-rural divide -Even people in rural areas can access legal help.
• Promotes inclusivity-Justice isn’t limited to those who can afford lawyers or travel to cities.

Think of it as: -Instead of one big courtroom in a city = justice is centralized.
Multiple digital doors to resolve disputes from home or village = justice is decentralized.

“ODR plays a vital role in decentralizing access to justice by empowering individuals to resolve disputes efficiently, without the need to navigate the complexities of formal courtrooms.

Legal Evolution of Online Dispute Resolution in India

The legal recognition and practical implementation of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in India have progressively expanded alongside the nation’s digital advancement in commerce and governance. While the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provided a statutory framework for traditional Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) processes such as arbitration and mediation, it did not expressly account for technology-enabled dispute resolution. However, with rapid innovations in legal technology and the growing emphasis on judicial efficiency, ODR has emerged as a pragmatic extension of ADR. The shift was significantly accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic, which necessitated the digital transformation of courtrooms and dispute resolution forums, thereby institutionalizing virtual hearings, e-filings, and remote mediation processes across judicial and quasi-judicial platforms.

ESSENTIAL TECHNIQUES OF ODR

• Online Mediation – An impartial third party assists those in conflict in reaching a mutually beneficial resolution through online communication.
• Online Arbitration – An unbiased adjudicator reviews the presented evidence and delivers a legally enforceable decision via online platforms.
• Online Negotiation – Through ODR platforms, the disputing parties engage in direct negotiation to settle their issues without involving a neutral intermediary.

KEY ELEMENTS OF ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ODR) PLATFORMS

• AI-Based Case Analysis – Artificial intelligence is utilized to assess case-related data, interpret legal precedents, and draw insights from legal databases, offering informed recommendations for potential outcomes.
• Automated Legal Assistants and Chatbots – These AI-driven tools assist users in the early stages of conflict by offering guidance on their legal entitlements and possible courses of action, thereby making legal support more accessible.
• Virtual Hearings and Digital Document Submission – Dispute resolution is conducted via secure video conferencing, with parties submitting relevant evidence electronically to ensure clarity, security, and procedural efficiency.
• Blockchain Technology and Self-Executing Contracts – Blockchain ensures the immutability and transparency of records, while smart contracts automate the enforcement of agreed-upon terms, reducing the need for manual intervention and enhancing trust between parties

LEGAL ARCHITECTURE GOVERNING ODR IN INDIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM

• Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 and Electronic Evidence:Section 61 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), which formally recognizes electronic records as admissible evidence in courts
• The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) Sections 105 and 185 of the BNSS makes the requirement mandatory of audio-video recording, ideally using a cell phone, of every search conducted and every property seized during an investigation
• Section 530 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, permits trials, inquiries, and proceedings to be conducted electronically, encompassing the issuance, service, and execution of summons and warrants, examination of complainants and witnesses and recording of evidence through electronic communication and or audio-video electronic means. (1)
• Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  Recognizes arbitration agreements formed electronically; Section 7(4)(b) arbitration clauses communicated through electronic means that are in writing are given full legal validity.
• Information Technology Act, 2000
  Grants legal recognition to electronic records and digital signatures (Sections 4 ), enabling online agreements and submissions to be treated equivalently to traditional counterparts
• Consumer Protection Act, 2019
  This act brought about the creation or led to the formation or the establishment of electronic dispute resolution mechanisms like the E‑Daakhil portal and virtual mediation for consumer grievances. Section 65 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, prescribes the formal process for delivering notices in matters falling under the Act. It enumerates the legally recognized modes of service, which expressly include electronic communication, alongside traditional methods. Furthermore, it empowers the District Commission, State Commission, and National Commission to officially record and affirm that a notice has been duly served in accordance with the prescribed procedure, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and procedural fairness.,

• Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
  Supports virtual Lok Adalats, fostering accessible conciliation and mediation services online.
• Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Section 89 & Order X Rule 1A)-Empowers courts to guide parties toward ADR methods, including ODR, thereby integrating such mechanisms into the formal judicial process.

CASE LAWS

1. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai,(2003) 4 SCC 601
   -Held that recording evidence via video conferencing is permissible under law and equated with physical presence.
2. Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. & Anr. v. AES Corporation 2006 134 CompCas 305 Orissa
   -Recognized remote communications and appointment of arbitrators via electronic means.
3. M/s Meters and Instruments Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Kanchan Mehta,(2018) 1 SCC 560
   – Encouraged the use of summary procedures and digital mechanisms for speedy justice in cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable instruments Act.
4. Shakti Bhog Foods Ltd. v. Kola Shipping Ltd.,(2009) 2 SCC 134
   – Accepted arbitration agreements formed through email as valid and enforceable.
5. Trimex International FZE Ltd. Dubai v. Vedanta Aluminium Ltd., India,(2010) 3 SCC 1
   -Affirmed that contract formation through electronic means (emails) is valid under Indian law.
6. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission v. National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd.,(2010) 10 SCC 280
   – Upheld the service of notices and communications through electronic means in regulatory proceedings.
7. Tata Sons Ltd. v. John Doe(s), CS (Comm.) 1601/2016 , Delhi High Court
   – Permitted service of summons through email and modern modes in exceptional situations.
8. Dr. M.V. Dawalbhakta & Ors. v. Bendale Brothers,WRIT PETITION NO. 4217 OF 2018
   – Recognized electronic service of legal notices and communications.
9. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer and Others, (2014) 10 SCC 473
   Issued directions regarding the conditions for accepting electronic records as evidence in accordance with Sections 65A and 65B of the Indian Evidence Act.
10. Kross Television India Pvt Ltd v Vikhyat Chitra Production 2006 134 CompCas 305 Orissa – The Bombay High Court has acknowledged instant messaging platforms as a valid mode for serving legal process, permitting the delivery of summons through whatsapp.

Current Developments & Momentum

• Covid‑19 Catalyst: Widespread adoption of Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet propelled the shift toward online dispute resolution.
• Rise of ODR Platforms: Entities like OCMC (Online Consumer Mediation Centre), Presolv360, Sama, Peacegate etc., have resolved numerous disputes digitally
• Mediation for the Nation” Campaign: Launched by Calcutta High Court in July 2025, encouraging hybrid/online mediation across a spectrum of cases to combat more than 2 lakh pending cases case backlog. (2)

Key Judicial Developments Affirming ODR’s Ascent in India

1. Delhi High Court Recognizes WhatsApp & Email as Binding Arbitration Agreements

In the case of Belvedere Resources DMCC v. OCL Iron and Steel Ltd. & Ors. (Delhi High Court, July 2025)SCC OnLine Del 4652 decided on 1-7-2025, the Court held that an arbitration agreement can appear from the exchange of emails and WhatsApp messages, even without a signed document. While interpreting Section 7(4)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the ruling emphasized that the core requirement is a clear and proven mutual agreement to resolve disputes through arbitration, irrespective of the form in which it is expressed (3)

This judgment aligns with earlier Supreme Court reasoning particularly in Great Offshore Ltd. v. Iranian Offshore Engineering & Construction Co. (2008) – contractual consent may be deduced from modes of communication such as email exchanges or written correspondence. (4)

2. Electronic Service via WhatsApp and Email Upheld by Delhi High Court

In M/s Lease Plan India Pvt. Ltd. v.  Rudraksh Pharma Distributor & Ors. (Delhi High Court, April 2024 SCC OnLine Del2687), the Court authorized the service of arbitration notices through email and WhatsApp. This direction was given when traditional postal services failed, establishing that alternative digital channels are legally acceptable if contact details are explicitly provided in the underlying agreement. (5)

3. E‑Daakhil E‑Jagriti Consumer Grievance Portal

The government’s consumer resolution portal E‑Daakhil, now referred to as E‑Jagriti is being held at a national level. By late 2023, it had covered all states and union territories. As of November 2024,281,000 users were registered, 198,725 complaints were filed, and 38,453 were resolved through the portal. This highlights ODR’s operational scalability and real-world impact across consumer justice mechanisms. (6)

Strengths of ODR in India: A Legal Perspective

• Enhanced Access to Justice
  ODR removes physical constraints, enabling remote resolution of disputes across geographic boundaries. This is particularly transformative for rural litigants who would otherwise face logistical barriers.
  Statutory Backing:
• Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, authorizes the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, a provision that can now be adapted for digital implementation.
• The Information Technology Act, 2000 section 4 supports digital signatures and e-records, ensuring ODR’s legal sanctity
• Cost and Time Efficiency
  Digital platforms eliminate travel and associated costs, while streamlining proceedings through expedited communication—making ODR economically viable for small businesses and individuals.
  – In M/S Meters and Instruments Pvt. Ltd. v. Kanchan Mehta (2017) 1 SCC 560, the Supreme Court emphasized speedy dispute resolution using modern technology and ADR process
• Reduction in Judicial Load
  By diverting eligible disputes to ODR, the formal court system can function more efficiently, addressing the backlog of pending cases more effectively.
• Procedural Flexibility and Informality
  ODR’s online format allows parties to participate asynchronously, reducing procedural rigidity and enabling user‑centric dispute resolution.
• Supportive Legal Foundation
  While no standalone ODR law exists yet, its mechanisms draw legitimacy from existing statutes like the IT Act 2000, Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996, and Consumer Protection Act 2019.
• Flexibility and Convenience

ODR allows parties to choose timelines, forums, and even modes of communication (email, chat, video conferencing), enabling resolution from any location, thereby promoting convenience and minimizing conflict.

Challenges Facing ODR in India

A. Structural & Technological Barriers

• Digital Divide
  Rural areas face problems in internet access and digital literacy which in turn is limiting participation.Connectivity Gaps Remain Even as progress continues, as of July 2025, 337 villages in Arunachal Pradesh and many others across the Northeast still lack mobile network coverage. (7)

Over 30% of Households Lack Internet Access-Approximately 35% of Indian households remain without internet access, making a sizeable demographic unable to participate in digital dispute resolution. (7)

• Infrastructure Deficiency
  A lack of a dependable broadband and inadequate hardware continue to undermine effective engagement with ODR platforms.

B. Legal and Operational Impediments

• Ambiguity in Legal Framework
  Most ADR laws do not explicitly account for online modalities, leaving critical questions around enforceability and formal recognition unresolved.
• Privacy and Data Protection Risks
  Handling sensitive information online raises legitimate concerns regarding confidentiality, data breaches, and unauthorized access.
• Enforcement Challenges
  While arbitration awards are enforceable under existing laws, online negotiations or mediated settlements may lack legal teeth without explicit recognition or fast-track mechanisms.
• Jurisdictional & Procedural Concerns: – Determination of ‘place’ for mediation, differing rules across states, and the absence of face-to-face influence could dilute effectiveness

C. Behavioral and Cultural Hurdles

• Trust Deficit
  Users often question the neutrality, reliability, and binding nature of digital dispute mechanisms particularly where familiar court processes have been the default.
• Resistance to ADR Culture
  India’s legal culture remains court-centric. ADR even in physical form has lower inclination; shifting to fully digital ADR (ODR) compounds acceptance challenges.
  
  

D.Security Risks-

Security & Confidentiality: Online platforms may pose data‑leak risks.

Bridging Gaps

1. Enhance Digital Infrastructure

• Accelerate Broadband and Satellite Connectivity
  Expand digital infrastructure through the National Broadband Mission 2.0 and harness emerging satellite internet options like Starlink to reach remote areas. (8)

2. Deepen Digital Literacy Outreach

• Leverage CSC Network & Literacy Campaigns.
• Develop dedicated ODR awareness and training programs at Common Service Centres (CSCs) and through initiatives like PMGDISHA and Internet Saathi, with a special focus on reaching women and underserved communities.

3. Address Accessibility Gaps

• Deploy Mobile Digital Kiosks
  Establish mobile ODR kiosks or digital vans to serve regions with poor infrastructure, ensuring equitable access.

4. Strengthen Legal Frameworks

• Standardize ODR Protocols in ADR Laws
  Amendment in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to formally recognize ODR platforms and enforce ODR outcomes.

5. Ensure Data Privacy & Security

• Implement Secure Certification for ODR Platforms
  Mandate end-to-end encryption, strong authentication protocols, and compliance under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act.

6. Facilitate Judicial Support and Enforcement

• Enable Fast-Track Enforcement of ODR Awards
  Establish a clear judicial pathway for the recognition and enforcement of ODR-derived settlements and arbitral awards.

7. Platform Standards Development of secure, encrypted platforms that erase data post‑case and ensure confidentiality and Security- Online platforms may pose data‑leak risks; but platforms like Peacegate are designed to mitigate these.

8.Regulation & Oversight: Mediation Council of India under the 2023 Act can develop monitoring mechanisms

Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): A Legal Pathway to India’s Justice Future

Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) is steadily emerging as the cornerstone of a more inclusive, efficient, and technology-driven justice system in India. ODR is poised to revolutionize the way justice, especially for those historically excluded from the formal legal system. In a country where courts are burdened with over 5 crore pending cases (as per the National Judicial Data Grid), ODR offers a legally sound, scalable solution that aligns with constitutional principles under Article 39A, which mandates equal access to justice for all, irrespective of economic or social status. The recent enactment of the Mediation Act, 2023, which recognizes mediated settlements conducted online, further cements ODR’s place within the formal legal framework. Additionally, the Information Technology Act, 2000 provides the necessary legal infrastructure to authenticate electronic records, digital signatures, and online communications, ensuring that ODR proceedings are valid, enforceable, and secure. As India accelerates its digital transformation under flagship programs like Digital India, ODR becomes not just an alternative but a parallel justice delivery mechanism that promotes cost-effectiveness, transparency, and speed. From resolving micro-finance defaults to cross-border commercial disputes, the adaptability and legal legitimacy of ODR point toward a future where access to justice is no longer hindered by geography, economic status, or procedural delay, but is as swift and seamless as logging into a secure digital platform.

Conclusion

Online Dispute Resolution has significant potential to revolutionize access to justice in India. As our country moves toward becoming a truly digital economy, ODR is not merely a convenience — it is a necessity. With appropriate regulatory frameworks, data protection mechanisms, and inclusive outreach, ODR can bridge the gap between the citizen and the justice system. Judicial bodies are increasingly acknowledging digital channels for contract formation and service of process, while consumer dispute forums are implementing ODR mechanisms on a large scale.

Often mischaracterized as merely the digitization of traditional Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in fact represents a transformative shift in the delivery of justice. ODR is not confined to replicating arbitration or mediation processes through digital platforms. It presents a framework that encompasses the full dispute lifecycle covering prevention, early intervention, and resolution by seamlessly combining technology, data analytics, and well-structured legal process design.

By embedding dispute resolution capabilities directly into online ecosystems such as e-commerce platforms, government portals, and consumer services ODR facilitates real-time responses to emerging conflicts, reduces the burden on courts, and enhances user-centric access to legal remedies. Importantly, ODR fosters legal inclusivity by removing geographical, procedural, and economic barriers that often deter individuals and small businesses from seeking redress through conventional means.

In the words of former chief Justice of india D.Y. Chandrachud, “Online Dispute Resolution has the potential to decentralize, diversify, democratize and disentangle the justice delivery mechanism for the citizens in India.” This vision captures the essence of ODR’s potential to make justice not only more efficient but truly accessible and inclusive for all. (9)

---

Author: Nikita Verma

---