The advent of the internet facilitated virtual business transactions, connecting individuals across diverse locations and jurisdictions. This gave rise to a surge in cross-border disputes, prompting private organizations to develop innovative resolution techniques. eBay pioneered this effort in 1999 by introducing an online complaint filing system that initiated a settlement process. If the settlement was unsuccessful, an automated online mediation process followed. This model, evolving into more sophisticated variants, is now widely embraced by private organizations and states alike, commonly known as Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). ODR systems efficiently diagnose issues and employ automated negotiation, mediation, or arbitration to facilitate resolution[1].

Evolution of ODR:

The first instances of online dispute resolution (ODR) can be found in the 1990s as the Internet grew in popularity and so did the number of online transactions and problems arise from them. 

Broadly, ODR’s development across the world can be divided into three phases, with each phase benefiting from the subsequent innovations in Information Communication and Technology (ICT). The three phases are:

Phase One: eBay pioneers this experiment:

• The University of Massachusetts and the University of Maryland started the first ODR project initiatives in 1996.
• With the growth of e-commerce, doing business operations over the internet requires a stable system. ODR provided a fix for this issue.
• eBay launched a test project in 1999 to offer online dispute resolution services for disagreements between buyers and sellers using its marketplace.
• By 2010, eBay’s ODR technology was managing more than sixty million complaints annually.

Phase two: ODR start-up boom

• ODR’s progress and the proliferation of ODR platforms were spurred by this model’s success and the internet’s explosive growth. In 1999, a total of twenty-one new ODR programs were introduced.
• A small number of well-run platforms, such the Mediation Room, Smartsettle, and Cybersettle, have had a significant influence on the dispute resolution industry.

Phase Three: Adoption by the Executive and the judiciary

• Government interest in this new addition to the dispute resolution ecosystem has been sparked by the success of a few of the private ODR platforms.[2]

Advantages of ODR:

The integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) into dispute resolution processes, known as Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), presents several significant advantages. These benefits, already experienced in various jurisdictions, are crucial for overcoming challenges associated with traditional courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) systems. Here are key advantages of ODR:

1. Cost-Effective:

ODR offers a cost-effective mode of dispute resolution by eliminating the need for parties to travel or rent facilities. It has the potential to reduce legal costs, mitigate indirect costs faced by enterprises during lengthy litigation, and contribute to overall economic growth.

2. Convenient and Quick:

Addressing the issue of case pendency in traditional courts, ODR provides a faster and more convenient process for dispute resolution. It streamlines procedures, establishes fixed timelines, and eliminates the need for physical presence, making it especially beneficial for cross-border disputes and e-commerce entities.

3. Customizable Processes:

ODR allows for the integration of various non-traditional processes and the use of artificial intelligence, leading to limitless possibilities. This flexibility enables the development of custom processes, such as med-arb or arb-med-arb, making dispute resolution more tailored, cost-effective, and user-friendly.

4. Encourages Dispute Resolution:

ODR tools, like online negotiation and mediation, address concerns related to physical access to courts, costs, and disabilities. By providing a less adversarial and more accessible dispute resolution experience, ODR encourages more parties to opt for formal means of resolving disputes.

5. Limits Implicit Bias:

 ODR procedures lessen the influence of biases resulting from human contacts, especially those that rely on text and email correspondence. ODR reduces the impact of unconscious biases by focusing on resolving disputes based on submitted claims and facts by removing audio-visual cues linked to gender, social status, ethnicity, and race.

Even though ODR could solve current problems, it’s important to be aware of any potential biases artificial intelligence may have added into the ODR process. Overall, nevertheless, the advantages paint ODR as a revolutionary instrument for improving the impartiality, efficiency, and accessibility of dispute resolution.[3]

Challenges to ODR:

We are on the verge of the digital revolution in dispute resolution with Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), so it’s critical to evaluate the obstacles that come with this paradigm shift. Even while ODR has great potential for effective and easily accessible resolution, we must also pay attention to the realities of digital divides, privacy concerns, and the need for cultural adaption. Some potential Challenges to ODR can be:

• Digital divide- Not all individuals or businesses have equal access to digital infrastructure and technology.
• Privacy concerns
• Lack of awareness
• Enforceability of ODR Decisions
• Resistance to change
• Lack of standardised process
• Ensuring Neutrality and Impartiality[4]

In facing the challenges posed by Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), India can draw inspiration from the age-old wisdom that ‘Every problem is an opportunity in disguise.’ These challenges are not roadblocks but rather invitations to innovate and implement remedies that advance ODR into a seamless and trusted dispute resolution mechanism.

Here are certain remedies to overcome the above-mentioned challenges:

• Large-scale investments in rural internet infrastructure and extensive digital literacy initiatives are necessary for bridging the digital divide.
• Strong cybersecurity defences, encryption methods, and conformity to global privacy norms can all help allay worries about security and privacy.
• To overcome the lack of knowledge regarding ODR, social media efforts and partnerships with educational institutions are essential for raising awareness.
• Independent online dispute resolution (ODR) platforms with reduced algorithmic biases must be established to guarantee objectivity and neutrality in online environments.
• By collaborating with international organisations to establish a framework for the recognition and enforcement of ODR rulings, complex enforcement issues—particularly those involving cross-border issues can be resolved.
• Lastly, the lack of standardised processes can be addressed by working together worldwide and standardising ODR procedures at the national level.

Benefits of ODR for the Dispute Resolution Ecosystem:

ODR, aligned with a four-layer model for access to justice, aids in dispute resolution, containment of dispute, avoidance, and legal health promotion. Its tech-driven nature ensures efficiency and adaptability to diverse cases.

Current Status of ODR in India:

Courts, including Justice Ramana and Chief Justice Bobde, have acknowledged the imperative for Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) mechanisms, recognizing their applicability in consumer, family, business, and commercial disputes. Justice Bobde has emphasized the need for virtual court proceedings, advocating for the binding nature of mediation agreements and endorsing international arbitration and artificial intelligence (AI) as alternatives. The introduction of ‘SUVAS,’ an AI-powered translation engine, further exemplifies the push for technological intervention in dispute resolution. The formal discourse on ODR in India commenced with the Nilekani panel in 2019, recommending the establishment of ODR systems for digital payment-related complaints, featuring both automated and human levels with an appeal provision. Urgency induced by the COVID-19 pandemic has fueled momentum for ODR adoption, evident in initiatives like the meeting organized by NITI Aayog, Agami, and Omidyar Network India, stressing ODR’s potential for small and medium disputes. Recognizing its role in enhancing access to justice and facilitating economic revival, ODR is poised to become a primary mode of dispute resolution in India.[5]

Supreme Court’s Role in Catalysing Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in India:

The Supreme Court of India has been pivotal in laying the groundwork for the integration of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in the country. Notably, in State of Maharashtra v Praful Desai[6], the court affirmed the validity of videoconferencing for obtaining evidence and witness testimonies, describing ‘virtual reality as the actual reality.’ This perspective was reinforced in Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. v AES Corporation[7], where the court acknowledged the effectiveness of electronic media and remote conferencing, negating the necessity for physical presence. In M/S Meters and Instruments Pvt. Ltd. v. Kanchan Mehta[8], the court advocated considering online resolution for certain cases, particularly citing examples like traffic challans and cheque bouncing. Moreover, the court has endorsed the legitimacy of online arbitration agreements in cases such as Shakti Bhog v. Kola Shipping[9] and Trimex International v. Vedanta Aluminium Ltd[10]., emphasizing compliance with relevant legal provisions. This confluence of technological integration in dispute resolution and the emphasis on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) signals India’s strategic move towards embracing ODR.

 Evolving Landscape of Dispute Resolution in India:

Richard Susskind’s vision for access to justice, encompassing legal health promotion, dispute avoidance, containment, and authoritative resolution, resonates with the evolution of dispute resolution in India. While the traditional focus has been on resolution, the current need is to shift towards avoidance, containment, and enhancing overall legal health. Investing in Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) with advanced technology, including second-generation tools, is crucial for India’s legal progress. The collaboration between the judiciary, executive, and private sector capabilities is essential for adopting innovative technologies that align with both legal and economic principles. Despite current challenges, the future of dispute resolution lies in technology and Artificial Intelligence (AI), where ODR can contribute significantly by evolving techniques for neutral evaluation of legal relationships. India possesses the foundational elements for a comprehensive technology-driven dispute resolution framework, including institutional willingness, expertise, and technology capacity. A modular strategy for innovation and transformation, addressing immediate and long-term needs, is imperative for the future of legal processes in the country.[11]

Driving ODR Forward:

To mainstream ODR in India, infrastructure development and capacity-building are essential. Government initiatives addressing digital literacy and physical access to technology are underway. Collaborative efforts to train ODR professionals, including paralegal volunteers and Court Registry officials, are vital. Encouraging private sector innovation through legal tech hubs and tax incentives is crucial for sustained growth. Government and judiciary leadership, adopting ODR for litigation and integrating it into specific departments, will build public trust. Efforts to integrate ODR into court annexed centres, leveraging AI/ML for efficiency, are vital for fostering ODR in India.[12]

The trajectory of ODR in India signals a paradigm shift in dispute resolution. The confluence of technological integration, judicial recognition, and government initiatives positions ODR as a cornerstone for accessible, efficient, and modern dispute resolution in the country.

Conclusion

In my opinion, ODR is a force for progress in the legal system. It is admirable that it could improve accessibility, efficiency, and customization of justice to the specifics of every case. I see ODR as a useful instrument in resolving the systemic issues that have remained with our conventional dispute resolution procedures as a future member of the legal profession. But this hope is accompanied with a warning to exercise care. Although the integration of artificial intelligence holds great promise, it necessitates careful monitoring to avoid the introduction of new biases. It is crucial that we achieve a balance between the ethical principles that guide our legal system and technological innovation as we embrace ODR.

To sum up, online dispute resolution (ODR) is not only a technology advancement but also a driving force behind a cultural change in the way we resolve disputes. With its capacity to promote a more inclusive legal culture, democratize justice, and cut back on backlogs, ODR is positioned to play a significant role in determining the direction of dispute resolution in India. From my perspective as a law student, ODR seems like a promising path that will present opportunities and challenges for an evolving legal system.

---

[1] 7Gintarepetreikyte, ‘ODR Platforms: eBay Resolution Center’ (The 15 th ODR Conference, 14 April 2016) accessed 20 Jan 2024

[2] The NITI Aayog Expert Committee on ODR, Designing the Future of Dispute Resolution: The ODR Policy Plan for India, October 2021, available at https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-03/Designing-The-Future-of-Dispute-Resolution-The-ODR-Policy-Plan-for-India.pdf > accessed 20 Jan 2024

[3] The NITI Aayog Expert Committee on ODR, Designing the Future of Dispute Resolution: The ODR Policy Plan for India, October 2021, available at https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-03/Designing-The-Future-of-Dispute-Resolution-The-ODR-Policy-Plan-for-India.pdf > accessed 22 Jan 2024

[4] Varsha, ‘Online Dispute Resolution And Access To Justice: Analysing Challenges And Opportunities,’ BNBLegal (June 19, 2023), accessed January 25, 2024, https://bnblegal.com/article/online-dispute-resolution-and-access-to-justice-analysing-challenges-and-opportunities/.

[5] Justice N.V. Ramana, ‘Delay reduction at different tiers of the court system, pre-trial settlement (use of conciliation procedures for dispute resolution) – The experience of the Supreme Courts of Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) countries’ accessed 20 Jan 2024

[6] State of Maharashtra v Praful Desai (2003) 4 SCC 601

[7] Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. v AES Corporation (2002) 7 SCC 736

[8] M/s Meters and Instrument Private Limited v Kanchan Mehta 2017(4) RCR (Criminal) 476

[9] Shakti Bhog v Kola Shipping (2009) 2 SCC 134

[10] Trimex International v Vedanta Aluminum Ltd 2010(1) SCALE574

[11] Vidhi Center for Legal Policy, The Future of Dispute Resolution in India Final Version, https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/200727_The-future-of-dispute-resolution-in-India_Final-Version.pdf (accessed Jan. 24, 2024)

[12] Vidhi Center for Legal Policy, The Future of Dispute Resolution in India_Final Version, https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/200727_The-future-of-dispute-resolution-in-India_Final-Version.pdf (accessed Jan. 24, 2024)

---

Author: Shweta Singh

---