The rapid advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have revolutionized various industries, offering numerous benefits, from improved efficiency to enhanced decision-making. However, as AI becomes more pervasive, questions surrounding liability and responsibility arise. The interplay between AI and liability is a complex and evolving field that requires careful examination to ensure a fair and just legal framework for the automated world. This article delves into the challenges, current trends, and potential solutions related to AI and liability.

What do we mean by Artificial Intelligence?

Artificial intelligence refers to the development of software and systems capable of intelligent thinking, resembling human cognition. These AI systems are composed of complex neural networks, consisting of algorithms and software-generated datasets, rather than being explicitly programmed by humans. To solve problems, AI breaks them down into numerous pieces of information and processes them step by step to achieve meaningful outcomes. AI finds applications in various areas, including expert systems, natural language processing, speech recognition, and machine vision. The challenge lies in understanding the calculations and strategies employed by AI to make decisions, leading to the ‘black box paradox’ or ‘explainability issue,’ especially concerning legal liability.[1]

The growing prominence of AI systems and their expanding autonomy in decision-making across different industries presents significant legal challenges. As AI becomes more sophisticated, it raises concerns about potential consequences when accidents or harm occur due to AI-driven decisions. The issue lies in determining responsibility and liability for such incidents, as the complexity of AI algorithms makes it challenging for humans to comprehend the exact reasoning behind the decisions made by these systems. This lack of transparency leads to the ‘black box paradox,’ making it difficult to attribute accountability and address legal ramifications adequately. As AI continues to evolve, finding appropriate legal frameworks to deal with AI-related incidents becomes a crucial concern for society and policymakers.

Black Box Paradox

The “black box problem” refers to the inability to understand how deep learning systems arrive at their decisions or conclusions. This term is used to describe the lack of transparency in the decision-making process of these AI systems, where the reasoning behind their actions remains obscured and difficult to interpret.[2]

The legal system faces a significant challenge with companies using AI-powered models that prioritize accuracy over interpretability. These black-box models are created through algorithms directly from data, making it impossible for even the code developer to understand how the variables lead to the predicted output. Unlike the human mind, AI neural networks operate differently, and even listing all variables wouldn’t help dissect the algorithm’s complex functions.

This paradox poses difficulties under English law, where claimants seeking remedies must demonstrate both factual and legal causation. Criminal cases require determining the actus reus and mens rea, but understanding the AI’s internal data processing makes ascertaining the mental element impossible.

Although human minds have exhibited black-box functions, courts have historically held individuals accountable based on fault-based liability. However, sanctions can only be applied to legal entities. Thus, navigating AI-related legal liabilities remains a complex and challenging task for the legal system.[3]

For instance, consider a scenario where an autonomous vehicle hits a pedestrian instead of applying the brakes as expected. Due to the black box nature of the AI system, we cannot trace the exact thought process that led to this decision. If such an accident occurs and it is found that the perception system failed to detect the pedestrian, experts would assume that the system encountered a novel or unfamiliar element in that particular situation. To improve its performance in the future, the system would then be analyzed to identify what caused the oversight, and it would be exposed to more similar situations for learning and enhancement.

Liability in case of Autonomous vehicles

Autonomous Vehicles, also known as self-driven cars, rely on AI technology to control their operations. These vehicles utilize a combination of sensors, actuators, complex algorithms, machine learning systems, and powerful processors to execute their software. Various sensors located throughout the car help the vehicle sense its environment. Radar sensors monitor nearby vehicles’ position and distance, cameras detect traffic lights, road signs, and track other vehicles and pedestrians, while LIDAR sensors use light pulses to measure distances, identify road edges, and detect lane markings. Currently, the main concern is not whether India is ready to accommodate autonomous vehicles technologically, but rather if Indian laws are equipped to handle the challenges arising from them, particularly the issue of liability for accidents.

In the UK, the development of regulations for autonomous vehicles has been more progressive. The Automated and Electric Vehicles Act, 2018, specifically states that the owner of the autonomous vehicle will be held liable for accidents caused by the vehicle. However, there are discussions on shifting liability to the manufacturer in future plans.

In the US, regulations on autonomous vehicles vary between states. Some states place liability on the manufacturer when the vehicle is in autonomous mode. The fatal Uber accident in Arizona [4]showed that human error played a significant role, and the driver was held liable.

In India, there is currently no specific legislation to regulate autonomous vehicles. Accidents involving motor vehicles are governed by the Indian Penal Code and the Motor Vehicle Act, which follows a “No Fault” liability principle. However, applying this principle to accidents involving self-driven cars raises questions about the manufacturer’s responsibility. Proposed amendments to the Motor Vehicle Act, 2016, are pending, seeking to exempt certain vehicles to encourage research and innovation. Under the Indian Penal Code, various laws address rash driving, causing death by negligence, causing hurt, and causing grievous hurt. However, the current statutes do not encompass self-driven cars. The Supreme Court has differentiated between the Indian Penal Code and the Motor Vehicle Act, stating that they serve different purposes. While both can hold individuals liable, they do not explicitly cover self-driven cars.[5]

Example of AI bias

AI bias is a prevalent issue that can be observed in various real-life scenarios. One example is the racism in the American healthcare system, where AI systems trained on non-representative data perform poorly for underrepresented populations, leading to biased predictions favoring white patients over black patients.

Another instance of bias is depicted in Google’s search results, where searches for “CEO” predominantly display male CEOs despite the relatively low representation of women in top executive positions. Amazon’s hiring algorithm also exhibited bias towards male applicants, penalizing resumes that indicated female gender or attendance at all-female institutions. While adjustments were made to address this bias, it highlights the potential for AI to perpetuate existing prejudices. In India, the absence of specific legislation for autonomous vehicles raises questions about liability and compensation in accidents involving self-driven cars.

 AI bias reflects society’s biases and is influenced by the underlying data used to train the models. Addressing this bias requires testing algorithms in real-life settings, accounting for counterfactual fairness, implementing Human-in-the-Loop systems, and reforming science and technology education to address these issues globally and locally. Recognizing and rectifying AI bias is essential to ensure that AI systems make fair and unbiased decisions, helping to mitigate discrimination and promoting equitable outcomes in various domains.[6]

Ethical implications of Artificial intelligence

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) presents ethical implications that must be carefully considered. One major concern is job displacement, as AI-powered machines and algorithms can replace tasks once performed by humans, leading to significant job loss in labor-intensive industries.

Another issue is privacy violations. AI systems collect and process vast amounts of data, potentially accessing and using personal information without proper authorization, resulting in breaches of privacy and data loss.

Additionally, AI systems can perpetuate and amplify societal biases present in their training data. For instance, facial recognition systems may exhibit higher error rates for individuals with darker skin tones, and predictive policing algorithms might disproportionately target certain racial groups. These biases can result in discrimination and threaten civil liberties.

To mitigate these potential negative consequences, ethical guidelines and regulations for AI development and usage are crucial. By implementing best practices, such as robust testing and validation processes, internal review mechanisms, and fostering an ethical culture within organizations, we can address these ethical concerns.

Both the government and the private sector have vital roles in governing AI ethics. Governments can establish regulations to protect individuals’ rights and invest in AI research. Private sector organizations must ensure compliance with guidelines and invest in ethical AI practices.

Overall, understanding and addressing the ethical implications of AI through responsible governance will help harness the potential benefits of AI while mitigating its negative impacts on society.[7]

Governance of AI

Presently, various regulations and guidelines are in place to govern AI development and usage, catering to different industries and AI applications.

One significant example is the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union. The GDPR contains specific provisions pertaining to AI, mandating organizations to be transparent about their use of personal data and obtain explicit consent for specific data uses.

The IEEE’s Ethically Aligned Design (EAD) guidelines are another notable initiative, providing a comprehensive framework for designing AI systems aligned with human values. These guidelines cover a wide array of aspects, including privacy, transparency, and accountability.

Furthermore, industry-specific regulations exist, like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) guidelines for responsible AI use in the financial sector and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidelines for ethical and safe operation of drones.

While there are no federal laws in the United States exclusively focused on AI, some states have introduced their own regulations, such as California’s Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Fairness Act.

It’s important to recognize that AI governance is an evolving field, and regulations and guidelines may undergo changes as AI technology continues to progress. Organizations involved in AI development and utilization must remain updated on the latest regulations to ensure ethical and compliant practices.

Principles & Strategies for Ethical AI

In ensuring responsible and ethical development and deployment of AI, organizations should adhere to key principles and adopt specific strategies.

Key Principles:

Transparency: Organizations should maintain transparency regarding data collection, use, and AI decision-making processes. This fosters trust with users and reduces unintended consequences.

Accountability: Organizations should be accountable for their AI systems’ actions and be capable of explaining and justifying decisions to align with human values and address any negative outcomes.

Fairness: AI systems should avoid perpetuating societal biases in decision-making. Using diverse data sets and regularly testing and monitoring systems’ performance helps achieve fairness.

Key Strategies:

Robust Testing and Validation: Implementing rigorous testing and validation processes ensures AI systems function as intended and helps identify and address errors or biases.

Internal Review Processes: Organizations should establish internal review mechanisms to ensure compliance with relevant regulations and guidelines.

Building an Ethical Culture: Invest in creating an ethical culture within the company by providing AI ethics training and fostering transparency, accountability, and fairness.

Constant Evaluation and Adaptation: Continuously evaluate and adapt AI development and deployment approaches to ensure ethical and responsible practices.

Ethical AI in the Government & Private Sector

Promoting ethical AI involves the active participation of both government and private sector organizations.

Government organizations have a responsibility to establish regulations and guidelines to safeguard citizens’ rights and ensure the ethical and responsible use of AI. This may include protecting privacy, preventing discrimination, and ensuring transparent and accountable AI systems. Governments can also invest in research and development to support ethical AI initiatives and provide funding for AI professionals’ education and training.

Private sector organizations hold the responsibility of complying with relevant regulations and guidelines while developing and using their AI systems. They should establish internal review mechanisms to ensure alignment with human values and be transparent about data collection and usage. Moreover, they should invest in fostering an ethical culture within the organization and educate their employees about AI ethics.

Collaboration between government and private sector organizations is crucial in promoting ethical AI. They can work together on research and development, share best practices, and participate in industry-wide initiatives and standards-setting bodies.

Navigating Trends & Challenges of AI Governance

As AI technology advances, new trends and challenges emerge in AI governance.

One significant trend is the increasing use of AI in critical infrastructure and high-stakes decision-making, such as healthcare, transportation, and criminal justice. Ensuring the safety, reliability, and impartiality of AI systems in these areas becomes imperative.

Additionally, the growing use of AI in the public sector introduces challenges related to transparency, accountability, and public trust. Striking a balance between effective governance and public acceptance is crucial.

Furthermore, there is a rising concern about malicious use of AI, such as cyber-attacks and disinformation campaigns. Addressing these threats requires improving AI system security and developing technologies to detect and mitigate malicious activities.

To address these challenges, collaboration between governments and private sector organizations is essential. Together, they can establish regulations, guidelines, and practices to promote transparent, accountable, and trustworthy AI. Investing in research, education, and training programs will equip the workforce to develop and govern AI ethically and responsibly, ensuring its positive impact on society.[8]

Conclusion

In conclusion, “Artificial Intelligence and Liability” offers a comprehensive examination of the legal questions surrounding liability and responsibility when AI systems make autonomous decisions. By analyzing recent cases and debates, the article sheds light on the complexities of assigning accountability in the context of accidents involving self-driving cars, algorithmic biases, and the accountability of AI developers and operators. The article aims to contribute to the ongoing discussions and efforts to navigate the legal implications of AI-driven decision-making and foster responsible and accountable AI development and deployment.

---

[1] Aryashree Kunhambu “Artificial intelligence and the shift in liability” available at: https://blog.ipleaders.in/artificial-intelligence-shift-liability/ (last visited on July 24, 2023)

[2] Samir Rawashdeh “Artificial intelligence can do amazing things that humans can’t, but in many cases, we have no idea how AI systems make their decisions” available at: https://umdearborn.edu/news/ais-mysterious-black-box-problem-explained#:~:text=This%20inability%20for%20us%20to,when%20they%20produce%20unwanted%20outcomes. (last visited on 24 July 24, 2023)

[3] Aryashree Kunhambu “Artificial intelligence and the shift in liability” available at: https://blog.ipleaders.in/artificial-intelligence-shift-liability/ (last visited on July 24, 2023)

[4] “Uber’s self-driving operator charged over fatal crash” available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54175359 (last visited on July 24, 2023)

[5] Lakshay Soni and Mandvi Khangarot “Autonomous Vehicles: Legislations for Liabilities” available at: https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-10606-autonomous-vehicles-legislations-for-liabilities.html#:~:text=But%20in%20short%2C%20the%20act,it’s%20a%20fault%20of%20AI. (last visited on July 24, 2023)

[6] Zoe Larkin “AI Bias – What Is It and How to Avoid It?” available at: https://levity.ai/blog/ai-bias-how-to-avoid (last visited on July 24, 2023)

[7] Nitesh Kumar “Is Artificial Intelligence Bound by a Legal Framework Too?” available at: https://www.analyticsinsight.net/is-artificial-intelligence-bound-by-a-legal-framework-too/ (last visited on 25 July 2023)

[8] Chandana Surya “Governing Ethical AI: Rules & Regulations Preventing Unethical AI” available at: https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2023/01/governing-ethical-ai-rules-regulations-preventing-unethical-ai/ (last visited on July 25, 2023)

---

Author: Mohammad Usman Khan

---